Monday 23 January 2012

FI qualifications, standards and credibility

Once again the IAAI-UK have managed to put on a very useful event. From the theft of cables underground to fire tests in space! At the end of the meeting Pete Mansi raised the very important topic of how we, as forensic investigation practitioners, fill the credibility gap left by the loss of the CRFP. I agree with Pete that it falls upon us and the various organisations we belong to or are associated with to move this issue forward (before somebody does it for us). FI is in danger of becoming even more fragmented and inconsistent across the UK. I would like to open the discussion now in our small group. Let's discuss the issues and then think about any solutions. Here are some thoughts: CRFP could be replaced by a similar subscription based body that is involved only with FI but what organisation could take this on? FI Training is seemingly run by whoever wishes to do so. To what standards? What input? What evaluation? Is it really all down to cost? Degree courses etc. are many-fold. What is the career path for the candidates? What is the value to the industry? Private providers are becoming profligate. They will get work eventually but the private sector is a minefield and expert witnesses can be prosecuted. Are we heading for potential bun-fights in court? Fire Services are continually cutting back and dedicated, full time FI is a luxury item. What are the consequences? Are skills lost or diluted? The loss of FSS was a strange turn of events for many of us I am sure. The private sector is slowly responding but what are the required standards? As long as they find somebody to do the job at the right price do the Police care? What are their criteria for engaging forensic experts? Communication and sharing of information is still very poor. The IFE will, hopefully, be able to provide a forum when there is sufficient IT funds available but that will never be sufficient to fill the gap. I like what I hear about what appears effectively to be the Nationalisation of the Fire Service in Scotland. CFOA are working on FI standards for England and Wales (not sure about NI. Can someone enlighten me please?). But none of this will affect the private market. And what about the private market? They are not bound by any rules, procedure or guidelines but they get the job done. And in many cases they get the job done very well indeed. Over to you..........

2 comments:

  1. I think it's very likely that FRS cutbacks will see the FI skills set shoved aside and reduced to what is needed to complete the FDR 1. It is, of course, both short sighted and sad, but it goes hand in hand with the removal of a professional base for Fire Safety and the privatisation of that and many other functions.

    I rather think the next fews years will be a bad time for several disciplines in the FRS, though, at last, someone has recognised the damage done by IPDS. As I have often pointed out, FI is an essential source of information if anyone wishes to target operational resources, fire safety policy and community education correctly. IRMP without accurate and reliable information - which the FDR 1 is not - will simply result in the FRS eventually being understrength, under equipped and inadequate to the demands placed on it - rather like the current UK Defence Strategies.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Forensic Investigation is very crucial since it can help solve cases. This kind of expertise really needs standards that will prove their credibility as professionals. It's a serious work and it must be given an attention.

    ReplyDelete